Sunday, October 23, 2011

Video: A local reporter's view

Dateline NBC

'Dateline NBC,' the signature broadcast for NBC News in primetime, premiered in 1992. Since then, it has been pioneering a new approach to primetime news programming. The multi-night franchise, supplemented by frequent specials, allows NBC to consistently and comprehensively present the highest-quality reporting, investigative features, breaking news coverage and newsmaker profiles.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032600/vp/44994872#44994872

rogue trader gone in 60 seconds gone in 60 seconds our lady of sorrows january jones top gun kat von d

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Humphrey to run seniors protection office (Star Tribune)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS and RSS Feed via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/150553972?client_source=feed&format=rss

lemur sharon megamind megamind human centipede 2 san diego weather mla format

Vanity Phone Number Provider Zoove Raises Additional $5 Million

zooveVanity phone number provider Zoove is today announcing it has raised an additional investment of $5 million from Rogers Ventures to help it further accelerate its U.S. operations. The startup is the exclusive provider of "StarStar numbers" (e.g. **FLOWERS) for the four largest mobile operators in the United States, reaching over 250 million consumers. Mike Lee, VP of Roger Ventures, the venture capital arm of Canada's Rogers Communications, will also be joining Zoove's Board of Directors as a part of this deal.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/7xabi0hTu24/

espn magazine espn magazine anywhere but here wall street protesters att new york yankees pittsburgh penguins

Friday, October 21, 2011

GOP speed daters ready to go steady with Romney? (AP)

WASHINGTON ? Michele Bachmann's moment came and went. Chris Christie was a no-show. Rick Perry faded. Now folks are waiting for the Herman Cain boomlet to go bust. Could it be that Republican voters are done speed-dating and ready to go steady with Mitt Romney?

Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and other what-about-me candidates are hoping that the meh-about-Mitt crowd may still be ready to check out someone else.

It's been that kind of year, after all, with first one candidate and then another capturing the party's attention ? for a time.

Remember when Bachmann surged to victory in the Iowa straw poll? When Christie's big tease that he might join the race captivated the party? When Perry still pulsed with Texas swagger?

Why not check out me next? the long-shot candidates reason.

After all, Santorum has been looking tough lately, Gingrich has turned in some thoughtful debate performances, Ron Paul's got a new ad blitz, and Jon Huntsman's pushing hard in New Hampshire.

And Romney, even with a big bump in his favorability ratings of late, still hasn't been able to generate much enthusiasm among GOP voters.

Republican strategist Mark McKinnon thinks GOP voters will "keep on looking right up until prom night."

"They like shopping around and the alternatives to Romney in theory, but when it gets to be more than just about lunch, the voters so far have been disappointed and let down," McKinnon says.

The idea that Republicans may still be willing to look around is what motivates Santorum, Huntsman and other candidates who are polling in the single digits to head out the door each morning to yet another town hall, Rotary club or fundraiser. They're vigorously challenging the top-tier candidates, sniping at President Barack Obama and keeping the debate stages crowded.

"I don't need a poll to tell us that we're moving up," Huntsman enthuses in New Hampshire.

Gingrich, who's kept his focus trained on what he considers Obama's shortcomings, has a new ad offering himself as "the right candidate at just the right time."

Paul is plowing $2 million into early primary state ads that dismiss his GOP rivals as big spenders beholden to Wall Street.

Santorum, whose tough talk has made him stand out in recent debates, is questioning Cain's credentials as a true conservative. And Perry, hoping to regain his stride, has been particularly aggressive in going after Romney in recent debates.

But Cain, whose popularity surged in recent weeks, isn't ready to cede the spotlight ? even if he's been widely dismissed as just the latest "flavor of the month."

Cain's comeback: "Haagen-Dazs black walnut tastes good all the time."

Huntsman, a former Utah governor, and Santorum, a former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania, are the only two GOP candidates who remain unknown to large numbers of Republicans, and that means they've got the widest opening to change opinions.

So it's sort of good news that 53 percent of Republicans don't have an opinion about Huntsman, and 48 percent don't have an opinion about Santorum.

Just about everybody's already got an opinion about Gingrich, by contrast. But the former House speaker has made some headway recently in shifting people from the negative to positive column.

Democratic strategist Bob Shrum, a veteran of multiple presidential campaigns, thinks Cain is destined to fade. The former pizza executive and his 9-9-9 tax plan have been coming under tough scrutiny since voters sent his stock rising.

But Shrum throws cold water on the idea that any of the GOP also-rans will be the next big thing, supplanting Cain.

"There are very limited outcomes here," Shrum says. "If Perry gets a bounce in the next week or two, then he's alive again and he could become a real alternative.

"In the absence of that," says Shrum, "Romney has to be the nominee ? unless the party completely loses its mind."

___

Associated Press writer Philip Elliott and Deputy Polling Director Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.

___

Nancy Benac can be reached at http://twitter.com/nbenac.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111021/ap_on_el_pr/us_gop_speed_dating

broncos broncos tough love tough love patriots jets patriots jets denver broncos

Social Security benefits to go up 3.6 percent

FILE - In this Feb. 11, 2005 file photo, trays of printed social security checks wait to be mailed from the U.S. Treasury's Financial Management services facility in Philadelphia. Social Security recipients will get a raise in January _ their first increase in benefits since 2009. Experts expect the increase will be about 3.5 percent. Some 55 million beneficiaries find out for sure Wednesday when an inflation measure that determines the annual cost-of-living adjustment is released. (AP Photo/Bradley C. Bower, File)

FILE - In this Feb. 11, 2005 file photo, trays of printed social security checks wait to be mailed from the U.S. Treasury's Financial Management services facility in Philadelphia. Social Security recipients will get a raise in January _ their first increase in benefits since 2009. Experts expect the increase will be about 3.5 percent. Some 55 million beneficiaries find out for sure Wednesday when an inflation measure that determines the annual cost-of-living adjustment is released. (AP Photo/Bradley C. Bower, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Social Security benefits will go up by 3.6 percent next year, the first increase since 2009 for the one in five Americans who rely on government retirement and disability programs.

The higher benefits will provide relief to more than 60 million people, many who have seen their retirement accounts dwindle, home values drop and out-of-pocket medical costs rise in the years since their last raise.

Starting in January, 55 million Social Security recipients will get increases averaging $39 a month, or just over $467 for the year. In December, more than 8 million people who receive Supplemental Security Income, the disability program for the poor, will get increases averaging $18 a month, or about $216 for the year.

It may not sound like much, said Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "But for millions of American seniors already suffering in this economy and facing years of rising costs, shrinking returns on their savings and no cost-of-living increases, today's COLA announcement lets them know there's some relief around the corner."

AARP Executive Vice President Nancy LeaMond said the increase "underscores the importance of Social Security as the only guaranteed, lifelong and inflation-adjusted source of retirement income for most Americans."

The annual cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, is tied to an inflation measure released Wednesday. The measure, which was adopted in the 1970s, produced no COLA in 2010 or 2011 because inflation was too low. Those were the first two years without a COLA since automatic increases were enacted in 1975. Social Security recipients did, however, receive a one-time $250 payment from the economic stimulus package passed in 2009.

Economists say higher Social Security payments should provide a modest boost to consumer spending next year, which should help the economy. President Barack Obama is pushing for more robust measures, but he is having little luck getting Congress to agree.

This year, Social Security will pay out $727 billion in benefits to retirees, disabled people, surviving spouses and children, the agency said. Monthly Social Security payments average $1,082, or about $13,000 a year.

The COLA would add $25 billion to $30 billion to those payments next year, providing additional spending money for retirees and disabled people.

"It is not a magic bullet for the economy, but it will certainly be a positive for households on fixed incomes," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics.

David Wyss, former chief economist at Standard & Poor's, said most analysts have already factored the COLA into their growth estimates for next year. Wyss foresees the economy growing at a sluggish rate of around 2 percent in 2012, while Zandi thinks the economy will grow by 2.6 percent.

"The COLA will help the economy a bit," Wyss said. "At least, it is moving in the right direction. But it is not a game-changer."

Some of the increase in January will be lost to higher Medicare premiums, which are deducted from Social Security payments. Medicare Part B premiums for 2012 are expected to be announced next week, and the trustees who oversee the program are projecting an increase.

The amount of wages subject to Social Security taxes will also go up next year, resulting in a tax increase for about 10 million workers, the Social Security Administration said. This year, the first $106,800 in wages is subject to Social Security payroll taxes. Next year, the limit will increase to $110,100.

Workers pay a 6.2 percent Social Security tax on wages, which is matched by employers. For 2011, the tax rate for workers was reduced to 4.2 percent. The tax cut is scheduled to expire at the end of the year, though Obama wants to expand it and extend it for another year.

Federal law requires the program to base annual payment increases on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, or CPI-W. Officials compare consumer prices in the third quarter of each year ? the months of July, August and September ? with the same months in the previous year.

If consumer prices increase from year to year, Social Security recipients automatically get higher payments, starting the following January. If prices drop, the payments stay unchanged.

Social Security payments increased by 5.8 percent in 2009, the largest increase in 27 years, after energy prices spiked in 2008. But energy prices quickly dropped and home prices became soft in markets across the country, contributing to lower inflation in the past two years.

As a result, Social Security recipients got an increase in 2009 that was far larger than actual inflation. However, they couldn't get another increase until consumer prices exceeded the levels measured in 2008. This year, consumer prices in July, August and September were 3.6 percent higher than those measured in 2008, resulting in the COLA.

The COLA announcement comes as a special joint committee of Congress weighs options to reduce the federal government's growing budget deficit. In talks this summer, Obama floated the idea of adopting a new measure of inflation to calculate the COLA, one that would reduce the annual increases.

Advocates for seniors mounted an aggressive campaign against the proposal, and it was scrapped. But it could resurface in the ongoing talks.

Support for the COLA "should remind those politicians who are talking about cutting all future COLAs that they are playing with fire, the lives of fellow Americans and their own political futures," said Eric Kingson, co-director of Social Security Works, an advocacy group.

___

Associated Press writers Chris Rugaber and Martin Crutsinger contributed to this report.

___

Online:

Social Security Administration's COLA site: http://www.ssa.gov/cola/

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2011-10-19-US-Social-Security-COLA/id-7b473d1cced04666a8b3fad0d1d2aab7

detroit lions donovan mcnabb donovan mcnabb bears bears lions terrelle pryor

Annual Cancer Screening Tests Urged Less And Less | News One

doctor_visitAnnual cancer tests are becoming a thing of the past. New guidelines out Wednesday for cervical cancer screening have experts at odds over some things, but they are united in the view that the common practice of getting a Pap test every year is too often and probably doing more harm than good.

A Pap smear once every three years is the best way to detect cervical cancer, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force says. Last week, it recommended against prostate cancer screening with PSA tests, which many men get every year.

Two years ago, it said mammograms to check for breast cancer are only needed every other year starting at age 50, although the American Cancer Society still advises annual tests starting at age 40. Earlier this week, a large study found more false alarms for women getting mammograms every year instead of every other year.

?The more tests that you do, the more likely you are to be faced with a false-positive test? that leads to unnecessary biopsies and possible harm, said Dr. Michael LeFevre, one of the task force leaders and a professor of family and community medicine at the University of Missouri. ?We see an emerging consensus that annual Pap tests are not required for us to see the benefits that we have seen? from screening, he said.

Those benefits are substantial. Cervical cancer has declined dramatically in the United States, from nearly 15 cases for every 100,000 women in 1975 to nearly 7 per 100,000 in 2008. About 12,200 new cases and 4,210 deaths from the disease occurred last year, most of them in women who have never been screened or not in the past five years.

The cancer society and other groups say using Pap smears together with tests for HPV, the virus that causes cervical cancer, could improve screening. But the task force concluded the evidence is insufficient ?to assess the balance of benefits and harms? of that.

Instead, more lives probably could be saved by reaching women who are not being adequately screened now, the task force says.

And despite what many people suspect, cost has nothing to do with the task force?s stance, its leaders said.

?We don?t look at cost at all. We really are most concerned about harms,? said Dr. Evelyn Whitlock of Kaiser Permanente Northwest?s Center for Health Research in Portland, Ore., who led an evidence review for the task force.

Here are some questions and answers about the cervical cancer guidelines.

Q. At what ages should screening start and end?

A. The task force recommends against screening women under 21 or older than 65. Very few cervical cancer cases occur in women under 21, so the old advice to start screening three years after the age of first intercourse has been changed. HPV tests are only approved for women after age 30 because transient infections that don?t pose a cancer risk are more common at younger ages.

?We should not be screening teenagers. It?s not helping, it?s not finding any more cancers and it?s creating way too many harms for them,? said Debbie Saslow, the cancer society?s director of breast and gynecologic cancer.

Q. Should anyone else not be screened?

A. Women who have had their cervix and uterus removed should not be tested, but check with your doctor ? not all hysterectomies are complete; some leave the cervix.

Q. What does screening cost?

A. Paps cost $15 to $60; HPV tests run $50 to $100.

Q. Will insurance pay for HPV tests since the government panel doesn?t endorse them?

A. Probably. They are included in preventive services that other federal advisers say should be covered under the Affordable Care Act, and the government has continued to pay for mammograms for women who want them even if it is sooner or more often than the task force recommends.

Q. What if I?ve had the HPV vaccine?

A. Doctors don?t know how the vaccine will affect HPV test results or how long the vaccine lasts, so women should still be screened for cervical cancer if they are within the recommended screening ages.

Q. How can I comment on the guidelines?

A. The web site below for the task force tells how. Comments are accepted for a month before guidance is adopted.

RELATED:

Baseball Player Blames Racist Cop For Ruining Career

Source: http://newsone.com/nation/associatedpress4/annual-cancer-screening-tests-urged-less-and-less/

zeitgeist bush ellie goulding ginger aron ralston aron ralston grandparents day

Editor-in-Chief James B. Meigs Tackles 9/11 Myths at New York’s 92nd Street Y

October 18, 2011 5:00 PM Text Size: A . A . A The 92nd Street Y?s lecture series, one of most distinguished public forums in New York City, has featured such notables as Bill Clinton, Mikhail Gorbachev, Margaret Thatcher, and Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel addressing important issues of the day. On Wednesday, Oct. 19, at 7 pm, PM editor-in-chief Jim Meigs takes the stage to deliver a lecture titled ?9/11 Conspiracies Rebuffed.?

Conspiracy theories about the coordinated terrorist attacks of 9/11 have persisted for the past decade, with hundreds of books and thousands of web pages devoted to idea that the U.S. government encouraged, permitted or actually carried out the attacks. Meigs will refute the most prevalent theories with science, hard evidence and a healthy dose of common sense. ?Like so many others, I was in New York on September 11, 2001,? Meigs writes in his foreword to the second edition of the PM book Debunking 9/11 Myths, ?I am proud to have played a small part in ensuring that the events of that day are remembered honestly and well.?

?9/11 Conspiracies Rebuffed,? happens at the 92nd Street Y, 1395 Lexington Ave., New York, N.Y. For tickets, click here.

Source: http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/editor-in-chief-james-b-meigs-tackles-9-11-myths-at-new-yorks-92nd-street-y?src=rss

neil degrasse tyson braves braves harrys law orioles atlanta braves national coffee day